Elon Musk's Own Testimony Becomes His Greatest Liability

Musk's inconsistent testimony and emotional reactions during cross-examination have severely damaged his credibility in the OpenAI litigation, revealing that his demand for complete board control was primarily driven by personal power interests. The jury's visible skepticism suggests the case outcome will hinge on credibility and demeanor rather than technical arguments. For observers of AI governance and corporate disputes, the case demonstrates how even powerful figures can undermine their own litigation strategy through poor testimony.