ended3월 14일· 1 sources

I Benchmarked TimescaleDB vs ClickHouse vs MongoDB for Observability Data - The Results Surprised Me

TimescaleDB vs ClickHouse vs MongoDB 관측성 데이터 벤치마크 — 예상 밖의 결과

Why it matters

The author benchmarked TimescaleDB, ClickHouse, and MongoDB under identical conditions for observability workloads (logs, spans, metrics) across four volume tiers. ClickHouse showed a critical ingestion bottleneck at small batch sizes due to its async insert flush interval, with TimescaleDB outperforming it by 56x at batch size 100. TimescaleDB was selected as Logtide's default storage, with ClickHouse offered only for enterprise-scale deployments.

1
Sources
+0
24h
Growth
180d
Active
TimescaleDBClickHouseMongoDBLogtideObservabilityIngestion Latency

Sources

Related Issues