90표로 갈린 고려아연 주총 '표 쪼개기' 논란 왜

This case reveals a critical vulnerability in South Korea's shareholder governance: the concentrated voting system, originally designed to protect minority shareholders, is being weaponized as a defense mechanism by entrenched management. The precise 90-vote margin between two candidates, despite contradictory recommendations from ISS, strongly suggests sophisticated vote splitting orchestrated by management-affiliated groups with information advantages, exposing how institutional frameworks can be manipulated when insiders control the vote-counting process.