ended3월 30일· 1 sources
[스맥 경영권 분쟁]⑧ 대표 선임 분수령…표심 향방 촉각
Why it matters
SMAK's shareholder meeting demonstrates how complex voting mechanisms and narrow shareholding gaps can make management control unpredictable, with court decisions and minority shareholders becoming decisive factors. The 3% rule applied to auditor selection structurally disadvantages majority shareholders while amplifying retail investor power, fundamentally shifting control dynamics away from traditional ownership-based advantage. This case illustrates how procedural voting rules and small shareholder activism can override substantial shareholding margins in modern corporate governance battles.
1
Sources
+0
24h
—
Growth
175d
Active
SMAKSNT HoldingsShareholder MeetingProxy ContestAudit Committee